Legal Opinion

State v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1917No. 20,702PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The defendant was convicted of maintaining a liquor nuisance, and her appeal relates to the fact that the county attorney had inadvertently neglected to sign the information and was permitted to sign it after the jury was impaneled.

The information reads:

“I, Ross McCormick, county attorney of Sedgwick County, . . . come now here and give the court to understand and be informed, . . . [Here follows the charge] . . . Contrary to the form of the •statutes. ...

County Attorney.”

*53There was a positive verification of a private citizen appended to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. State v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  4. State v. CooverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. MacSherry v. EnrightNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. FreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Diamond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. State v. QueenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API