Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Garnett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 29, 1974No. 340962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Plaintiff-wife was divorced from defendant-husband in a decree dated January 29,1969 which, among other things, approved their property settlement agreement which had been received in evidence and it was made a part of the decree. In pronouncing its decree the court stated that the property settlement agreement was “given the force and effects of the decree.”

Wife appeals in this motion proceeding by the husband for modification of the decree and property settlement agreement. Part of the motion was granted on September 12, 1973. Wife contends that the trial court erred in its order by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prime v. PrimeOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hilton v. McNittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Unander v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Warrington v. WarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garnett v. GarnettOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re the Marriage of PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. In re the Marriage of McInnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API