Legal Opinion
Duke v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 3, 2004No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-4613PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2004, upon consideration of the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13, filed January 2, 2004), following a hearing on November 13, 2003, with both parties present, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
MEMORANDUM
I. BACKGROUND
A. PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, an Army veteran, filed the Complaint in this case on August 8, 2003. The gravamen of the Complaint is plaintiffs belief that he is entitled to 100 percent service connected disability benefits retroactive…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamilton v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Radford v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016