Commonwealth v. Marvin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant’s appeal, which we transferred here on our own motion, raises a single question arising from a judge’s denial of the defendant’s request that he be permitted to present a closing argument at his probation revocation hearing. The claim is that the denial violated the defendant’s right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment *292to the Constitution of the United States and art. 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel includes a defendant’s right to make a closing argument in a criminal trial. See Herring v. New York, 422 U.S.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. FaulknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. CanadyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. AquinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.