Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Marvin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 14, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant’s appeal, which we transferred here on our own motion, raises a single question arising from a judge’s denial of the defendant’s request that he be permitted to present a closing argument at his probation revocation hearing. The claim is that the denial violated the defendant’s right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment *292to the Constitution of the United States and art. 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel includes a defendant’s right to make a closing argument in a criminal trial. See Herring v. New York, 422 U.S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. FaulknerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. CanadyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. AquinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API