Legal Opinion

Glover v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 2007No. SC 88373PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. 1

INTRODUCTION

Oscar Glover was convicted of two counts of possessing drugs with intent to distribute in violation of section 195.211. 2 The convictions were affirmed on appeal. State v. Glover, 98 S.W.3d 917 (Mo.App.2003). Glover then filed this motion pursuant to Rule 29.15. He failed to sign the motion or the amended motion.

His amended motion alleged ineffective assistance of counsel: (1) in trial counsel’s failure to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument that vouched for a witness’ testimony and (2) in appellate counsel’s failure to raise on appeal the trial court’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PurleeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Kilgore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Naylor Senior Citizens Housing, LP, and John Dilks v. Sides Construction Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. State of Missouri v. Adriano Raphael Clark, Sr.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  4. State v. RoggenbuckSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Claus v. Intrigue Hotels, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API