Peace v. Allstate Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Judge.
The only question in this appeal is whether a Ford Bronco was available or furnished by Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) for the regular use of its employee, appellant Edwin E. Peace, and therefore excluded from coverage under the Allstate policy issued to him.1 In the trial court, summary judgment was awarded to Allstate. The trial court declared that Allstate provided no insurance coverage under the undisputed facts presented. We agree.
The facts, considered most strongly in favor of the appellant, show that on February 15,1980, the plaintiff, Edwin Peace and Robert…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pacific Automobile Insurance v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Home Insurance Company v. KennedySuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Whaley v. Great American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lake Havasu City v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Valentine v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006