Legal Opinion

Cullimore v. Schwendiman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1982No. 17749PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This appeal from the revocation of a driver’s license pursuant to Utah’s implied consent law, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-6 — 44.10, is now moot.

After being arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, appellant refused to submit to a breathalyzer test when re quested by the arresting officer. Utah’s implied consent statute provides that the Department of Public Safety “shall revoke for one year” the driver’s license of any driver who refuses to submit to such a chemical test. § 41-6-44.10(b). After determining in a hearing that appellant refused the breathalyzer test, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Duran v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Merhish v. H. A. Folsom & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pledger v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guardian Ad Litem v. State Ex Rel. C.D.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. LeggCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  3. Matter of Discharge of JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Phillips v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Moon v. SchwendimanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API