Legal Opinion
Howard v. Locke
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 30, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2009-1601Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANET HOWARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Case No. 09-1601 (RJL) GARY LOCKE, Secretary, U.S. ) Department of Commerce, et al., ) ) Defendants. ~ MEMORANDUM <iiIDER (July L:;2010) [#9] Plaintiff, Janet Howard ("Howard"), acting pro se, brings this action against Gary Locke ("defendant"), Secretary of the Department of Commerce ("Agency"), appearing to allege that her termination from the Agency was motivated by retaliation made unlawful under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Thomas C. Fox v. Marion D. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.