Legal Opinion
Weinstock v. Ladisky
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1950PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
The action herein is by the plaintiffs for a mandatory injunction commanding the defendant to reinstate them as members of the Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, from which they were expelled after trial.
There are two motions presented for decision. The plaintiffs have moved for an injunction pendente lite restraining defendant from interfering with or depriving plaintiffs of any of the rights which they have as members of the brotherhood. The defendant has cross-moved for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hurwitz v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- John F. English v. John CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Rosen v. DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 9 OF NEW YORK CITY, ETC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Johnson v. South Blue Hill Cemetery AssociationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Hurwitz v. Directors Guild Of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.