Southern Realty Corp. v. McCallum
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, comprising a large number of domestic and foreign corporations, seek by bill in equity to enjoin the enforcement of what is commonly known as the “Franchise Tax Law of the State of Texas.” Acts Tex. 1930, 5th Called Sess., e. 68. While the act is assailed on constitutional grounds, the issuance of a preliminary injunction was not insisted on, the parties having by agreement provided for holding in suspense the taxes paid under protest. The matter has accordingly been submitted for final hearing in the District Court, without the necessity for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern Realty Corporation v. McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- State v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Choquette v. PerraultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Rowan & Nichols Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1939
- State Life Ins. v. DanielDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1934