Rowan & Nichols Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLAN, District Judge.
This case as originally filed was one for three judges. Complainant, however, abandoned its application for interlocutory relief and the case was, by the agreement of all parties, submitted to one judge for final determination on its merits.
Complainant sues for an injunction to restrain the enforcement by the Commission of the order of August 29, 1938, in so far as it affects the production of oil from its-mineral lease in the East Texas field. By stipulation of the parties, it was agreed that it would be unnecessary to amend to cover the orders subsequently entered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- People's Petroleum Producers, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1932
- Southern Realty Corp. v. McCallumDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1932
3Cited by5 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940