Legal Opinion

Philo v. Rought

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County

Decided May 13, 1954No. 5PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pinola, J.,

Plaintiff, who is the widow of William L. Philo, brought a bill in equity against defendant asking that she be declared a trustee of certain real estate acquired by her but paid for with the funds of plaintiff’s husband; in short, that she be declared a resulting trustee.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, counsel for defendant moved for a nonsuit.

Since a nonsuit should only be entered in a clear case where plaintiff cannot recover under any view of the evidence with every doubt resolved against its entry and all inferences drawn most favorably to plaintiff, Shechter v. Shechter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dellacasse v. Floyd Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Chambley v. RumbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Shechter v. SHECHTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Campbell v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  5. Hale v. SterlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lock EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API