Legal Opinion

United States v. Chess

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 29, 2010No. 08-3755, 09-1762, 09-2198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Joseph Chess, Antwan Peterson, and Prince Coleman are three of the people who took part in an extensive conspiracy to sell heroin and fentanyl in the Dearborn Homes housing project in Chicago. Together with their co-defendant, Saundra Falls, they pleaded guilty to violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Falls has pursued an appeal from the sentence she received; we dispose of that appeal in a separate order. The attorneys for Chess, Peterson, and Coleman have all moved to withdraw from representation and to dismiss the appeals as frivolous, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Larry D. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. Lucky IrorereCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. PoetzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Kevyn TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. BeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API