Legal Opinion

United States v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 9, 2010No. 09-3201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Following a jury trial, Thomas Cunningham was found guilty of one count of bank robbery, see 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment, 30 months below his guidelines range of 210 to 240 months. Cunningham appeals, but his appointed counsel has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We review only the issues presented in counsel’s facially adequate brief and in Cunningham’s ■ response. See CIR. R. 51(b); United States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir.2002).

Cunn…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. United States v. Robert Schuh, Lisa Nolen, and Curtis LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cunningham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API