Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Bates Expanded Steel Truss Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 19, 1929No. 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

In this action at law to recover damages for alleged breach of contract, the plaintiff, relying upon Ex parte Peterson, 253 U. S. 300, 40 S. Ct. 543, 64 L. Ed. 919, moves for the appointment of an auditor to make a preliminary investigation with respect to certain facts touching the amount of damages occasioned by the alleged breach and to report his findings to the court to the end that the report be presented to the jury as prima facie proof of the matters therein set forth.

The declaration or statement of plaintiff’s case, upon which the motion is based, alleges, in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Holmes v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Parker v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  5. Fenno v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Graffis v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. In Re Utilities Power & Light CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Irving Trust Co. v. Trust Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API