Legal Opinion
In Re Utilities Power & Light Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 10, 1937No. 6228PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Appellants, as intervening creditors, appeal from an order of the District Court entered in a reorganization proceeding under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 207), appointing an investigator to investigate and report to the court in aid of administration of the estate. Appellees include the debtor, the Atlas Corporation, the appointee and an intervening creditor.
Appellants insist that there is no warrant in law for the appointment of an investigator and that to act upon his report would be to deprive appellants of proper judicial hearing.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. RiggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Thiede v. Utah TerritorySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. ManningDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1963
- Merritt v. Mt. Forest Fur Farms of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Orth v. Transit Inv. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- National Lock Co. v. HoglandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Laughlin v. ClephaneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.