Legal Opinion

Virginia Cedar Works v. Dalea

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk comity in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The object of this writ of error is to review a judgment obtained by the defendant in error, Juan Dalea, against the *335plaintiff in error, the Virginia Cedar Works, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries imputed to the negligence of the defendant.

The first assignment of error relates to the action of the court in overruling demurrers to the original and amended declarations.

The court overruled a demurrer to the original declaration and to each of the four counts thereof, and, thereupon, the plaintiff, by leave of the court, amended his declaration by filing a fifth count, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. Wakefield's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  3. Wynne v. Newman's Adm'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. So. W. Improvement Co. v. Smith's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hill v. NortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  3. Washington Southern Railway Co. v. CheshireSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co. v. ProbstSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API