Legal Opinion

Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co. v. Probst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 21, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Augusta county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This writ of error brings under review a judgment in behalf of the defendant in error, Probst, against the plaintiff in error, the Penn Foundry and Manufacturing Company, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries.

There was a demurrer to the declaration, which the court overruled, and that ruling constitutes the principal assignment of error relied on to reverse the judgment.

The declaration contains but one count and, after stating that the defendant was operating a manufacturing plant for the manufacture of saws and other tools, implements and machinery, and the employment of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hortenstein v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  3. Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Warner v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  2. Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Honaker Lember Co. v. CallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  4. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API