Legal Opinion

Estate of Wear

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1942No. S. F. No. 16301PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

20 Cal.2d 124 (1942)

Estate of KATIE RICHARDS WEAR, Deceased. THEODORE J. MILLER et al., Respondents,

v.

EDWARD ROLKIN, as Executor, etc., Proponent; ARLINE M. ROLKIN, as Executrix, etc., et al. (Substituted Proponents), Appellants.

S. F. No. 16301.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 2, 1942.

Frank J. Mahoney for Appellants.

James M. Hanley and Herbert Chamberlin for Respondents.

TRAYNOR, J.

Mrs. Katie Richards Wear owned certain real property in Sonoma County encumbered by deeds of trust securing promissory notes for $27,800 and by a mortgage securing a note for $3,525. In 1920 she entered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rafferty v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Estate of KearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Powell v. Tagami, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API