Mitchell v. St. Louis Argus Publishing Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Commissioner.
This matter reaches us on appeal from a judgment entered in a court tried case dismissing plaintiffs’ cause of action. Plaintiffs sought certain equitable relief which generally described would have placed them in control of the St. Louis Argus Publishing Company (hereinafter Argus) and ousted the individual defendants from control. Plaintiffs’ right to the relief sought depends on resolution of the ownership of ten shares of stock of the Argus, all of which is claimed by defendant Frank Mitchell, Sr. and 6⅜ shares of which is claimed by plaintiff Edwina Mitchell. The…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BlankenburgTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Brown v. ForscheMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Kitchen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Niederkorn v. NiederkornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- CACH, LLC v. AskewSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Union Electric Co. v. Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- White v. DelanoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Danna v. CasserlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.