Munoz v. Burge
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Jose Fernandez Munoz appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, raising several claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We assume that the parties are familiar with the underlying facts and procedural posture of the case, as well as the issues on appeal.
When a district court denies a prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, “[w]e review ... [that] denial ... de novo. ” Anderson v. Miller, 346 F.3d 315, 324 (2d Cir.2003).
There is insufficient evidence in the record to support the claim that a court officer at Munoz’s trial communicated with jurors in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. TabbNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. FennesseyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024