Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Burge

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 14, 2011No. 10-3834-prUnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Jose Fernandez Munoz appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, raising several claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We assume that the parties are familiar with the underlying facts and procedural posture of the case, as well as the issues on appeal.

When a district court denies a prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, “[w]e review ... [that] denial ... de novo. ” Anderson v. Miller, 346 F.3d 315, 324 (2d Cir.2003).

There is insufficient evidence in the record to support the claim that a court officer at Munoz’s trial communicated with jurors in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. VelasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. BonaparteNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. DamianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. TabbNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. FennesseyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API