Morris v. Ewing
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Pembina County; Sauter, J. Action by Mathilda Morris and others against Joseph Ewing. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.
This action was brought, under the statute, to quiet title to a quarter section of land situated in the County of Pembina. The following facts are conceded: That the land in question was on the 7th day of August, 1882, owned by the defendant, Joseph Ewing, and his brother, Robert Ewing, as tenants in common. That on the day stated, Robert Ewing, acting in his own behalf, and also assuming to act as the attorney in fact of his brother, the defendant, executed and delivered a mortgage in due form on said land to one William Camp, to secure a loan of $500 then paid over to Robert Ewing by said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wendell v. Van RensselaerNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Campbell v. Foster Home Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Grogan v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Deford v. MercerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Jeffrey v. HurshMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Inv., II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Westby v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Marqusee v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Invs. II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Spring Creek Exploration v. Hess Bakken InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018