Legal Opinion

Howard v. Lockhart

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1989No. 89-216, 89-94, and 89-93Published

1Opinion of the Court

777 S.W.2d 223 (1989)

300 Ark. 144

Daniel Ray HOWARD, Roosevelt Abernathy and Elgie Sanders, Appellants,

v.

A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellee.

Nos. 89-216, 89-94, and 89-93.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

October 9, 1989.

2Per curiam

These cases are consolidated, inasmuch as they have common characteristics. All are civil in nature, all are governed by the rule announced in Virgin v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 92, 702 S.W.2d 9 (1986), and Glick v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 417, 706 S.W.2d 178 (1986), and all reflect the same defect.

Roosevelt Abernathy, acting pro se, petitions for the appointment…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gerald D. Peterson v. Isadore NadlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. Glick v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Virgin v. AL LOCKHARTSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Howard v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API