Legal Opinion

Wentz v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1931No. 20621PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.

The plaintiffs in error constitute the State Highway Commission of the státe of Oklahoma and certain employees thereof and certain county officials of Jefferson county, Okla.; the defendants in error are residents of Jefferson county, Okla., and voters and taxpayers therein. This suit was brought by the defendants in error, as plaintiffs, against the plaintiffs in error as defendants, both in their individual and official capacities, and was for injunction and mandamus. Hereafter the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below. The plaintiffs seek to enjoin the State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wentz v. IngenthronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Harjo v. ChilcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Wentz v. Board of Com'rs of Lincoln Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SowardsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Aiken v. ArmisteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. State Highway Commission v. YoungerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Board of Com'rs v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Hawks v. SeaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API