Legal Opinion

Heuer v. Rubin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 14, 1948No. Docket 169/54PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to enforce a covenant in restraint of trade contained in a schedule which was part of a bill of sale. The bill of sale sets forth "that we, Irving Miller and Max Rubin, trading as Rahway Public Market" in consideration of $2,100, do sell to the complainants "all the goods and chattels particularly described and mentioned in the schedule hereto annexed and made part hereof." The schedule first lists store fixtures and equipment and an auto truck, and then continues:

"It is hereby understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the said parties of the first part, Max…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  2. Bond Electric Corp. v. KellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Scherman v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  4. Langberg v. WagnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  5. Glantz v. Willow Supply Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sonotone Corporation v. HallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API