Winchester Coalition for Responsible Development v. U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (does. 33, 25) and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (docs. 32, 24). 1 Plaintiffs have filed an action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from Defendants’ decision to build low-income housing in their neighborhood, the Canal Winchester area. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.
FACTUAL HISTORY
On September 11, 1996, CMHA requested HUD approval for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burkholder v. WykleDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002