Legal Opinion
Burkholder v. Wykle
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 2002No. 1:01CV1165PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On May 14, 2001, Donald and Marilyn Burkholder, plaintiffs, initiated the above-captioned case against Kenneth R. Wykle, 1 Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), and Gordon Proctor, Director of the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”), defendants. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege numerous violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. (“NEPA”), the National Federal Aid Highway Act, 23 U.S.C. § 100, et seq. (“Highway Act”), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701, et seq.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wuliger v. Office of the Comptroller of CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Donna W. Sherwood, et al. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Friends of the Mahoning River v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center v. LeavittDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007