State Ex Rel. Sanford v. Riddle
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The judgment of conviction exhibited by the state against the respondent in this proceeding is not subject to collateral impeachment. The United States District Court had jurisdiction of the offense under section 215 of the United States Penal Code (U. S, Comp. St. § 10385), and the record shows that it had jurisdiction of the respondent [defendant, there] .by virtue of an indictment regularly found. The subse- . quent irregularities complained of, and sought to be shown by evidence dehors the record, would have been proper matters to be considered on appeal, if properly shown, but cannot…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Sims v. . SimsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- National Trust Co. v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Neibling v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Ex Parte Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- In Re StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- In re WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.