Montgomery v. Murray
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice:
The broad issue in this appeal is whether the trial court’s order sustaining a motion for new trial in a rear-end automobile collision case should be affirmed or reversed.
The collision occurred when an automobile driven by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”, stopped, facing north, behind two other automobiles facing in the same direction, on Oklahoma City’s South May Avenue, where it intersects with a cross-street extending in an easterly and westerly direction. While plaintiff’s car was thus stopped, waiting in line to move ahead, an automobile…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Houston v. PettigrewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Aldridge v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Taliaferro v. ShahsavariSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Teague v. United Truck ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- SHAWAREB v. SSM HEALTH CARE OF OKLAHOMASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.