Balderman v. Capital City / American Broadcasting Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the follow*862ing Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion insofar as it seeks leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 Ob) to add ABC Holding Company, Inc. (ABC Holding), and American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (American Broadcasting), as defendants. The Statute of Limitations has expired and plaintiff is not entitled to the benefit of the relation back doctrine because those new defendants are not "united in interest” with the original defendant (CPLR 203 [b]; see,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buran v. CoupalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Ober v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Simpson v. Kenston Warehousing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Air Tite Manufacturing, Inc. v. Acropolis AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gielow v. Rosa Coplon HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Feszczyszyn v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bracken v. Niagara Frontier Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Smith v. Giuffre Hyundai, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Achtziger v. Fuji Copian Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.