Legal Opinion

Bainbridge, Inc. v. Douglas County School District Re-1

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1998No. 97CA0895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Defendants, Board of County Commissioners of Douglas County, Colorado School District RE-1, Douglas County, Robert A. Christensen, James R. Sullivan, and Suzy McDanal, appeal from the judgment requiring them to pay post-judgment interest on “school impact fees” ordered refunded to plaintiffs, Bainbridge, Inc.; Village Homes of Colorado, Inc.; Falcon Development Group, Inc.; d/b/a Falcon Homes, LHLI, Ltd.; Vir-den Homes, Inc.; The Genesee Company; Sattler Homes, Inc.; and Sugarbush Homes, Inc. We affirm.

In 1992, plaintiffs commenced this action for declaratory and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Bainbridge, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Stone v. CurriganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Sherard v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dunton v. Whitewater West Recreation, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Cooley v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. In re the Marriage of GutfreundSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. Edmonds v. Western Surety Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Westec Construction Management Co. v. Postle Enterprises I, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API