Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Gutfreund

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 20, 2006No. 05SC902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

We granted certiorari in this ease to consider whether depositing funds in a court registry stops post-judgment interest from accruing, and whether a party may seek post-judgment interest on attorneys’ fees awarded to the attorney.1 The court of appeals found that a deposit of funds into the court registry that does not allow access to funds by the opposing party does not satisfy the judgment and thus does not stop post-judgment interest from accruing. The court of appeals also found that post-judgment interest is required on attorneys’ fees and may be sought by a party even if the fees were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Board of County Commissioners, Costilla County v. Costilla County Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. In re Marriage of AldrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Investment Management Consultants, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re the Marriage of DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In re Marriage of AragonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. 30 Taylor Morrison of Colorado, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API