In re the Marriage of Gutfreund
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez
We granted certiorari in this ease to consider whether depositing funds in a court registry stops post-judgment interest from accruing, and whether a party may seek post-judgment interest on attorneys’ fees awarded to the attorney.1 The court of appeals found that a deposit of funds into the court registry that does not allow access to funds by the opposing party does not satisfy the judgment and thus does not stop post-judgment interest from accruing. The court of appeals also found that post-judgment interest is required on attorneys’ fees and may be sought by a party even if the fees were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Board of County Commissioners, Costilla County v. Costilla County Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In re Marriage of AldrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barrett v. Investment Management Consultants, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re the Marriage of DavisColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sinclair Transportation Co. v. SandbergColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Marriage of AragonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- 30 Taylor Morrison of Colorado, Inc. v. Terracon Consultants, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.