Legal Opinion

Britt v. Chestnut Hill College

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1993No. 2546PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting Appellees’, Chestnut Hill College’s and Thomas Earl Klee’s, preliminary objections to Appellant, Joseph Britt’s, Complaint. We reverse in part, and affirm in part.

The facts underlying this suit, are as follows. Appellant, a detective, enrolled in a Master’s Degree program at Chestnut Hill College in 1987 and expected to graduate in May of 1990. In order to fulfill the requirements for his degree, in June 1989, Appellant enrolled in a required one week course, entitled, “Gender Stereotyping”. The course was taught by Appellee Klee.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gundlach v. ReinsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Gray, D. v. Huntzinger, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. White v. BrommerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Capresecco v. Jenkintown BoroughDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Bernard v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API