Mobil Oil Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Opinion,
The Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Court of Common Pleas, after a de novo hearing, both refused appellants’ request for a variance. We affirm on the opinion of Judge Warren Gr. Morgan, reported herewith, which ably disposes of all the questions raised,, excepting one, i.e.: Does the record sustain the lower court’s decision? .We find that it does.
The case was exceptionally well tried by all counsel, both before the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the Common Pleas Court. In this appeal, appellants rely on a line of cases of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, including Standard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Andress v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- O'NEILL v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Ferry v. KownackiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boulevard Land Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Campbell v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- McKay v. Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Rees v. Zoning Hearing Board of Indiana TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Rubin v. Upper Southampton Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.