Legal Opinion

Societa Italiana Mutua Beneficenza Vittorio Emanuele III Di Ensley v. Lovoy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 784PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

General assumpsit by the widow of a deceased member of the defendant society to recover the sum of $363, with interest, alleged to be due the plaintiff, as death benefits, in consequence of the death of her husband while a member of said society, on the 25th of May, 1930.

[1] The complaint is not subject to the objection of uncertainty pointed out in Posey v. Hair, 12 Ala. 567, where no specific sum was claimed, but only the amount of “a certain debt then due and owing,” no amount being stated.

[2-4] The law is settled that in special assumpsit to recover damages for the breach…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. LittletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Smith v. SharpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. McCormick v. BadhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. FiquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. v. GolsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Dabney v. GroverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API