Legal Opinion

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Fiquett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1934No. 5 Div. 170PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an action of assumpsit by the beneficiary named in an “ordinary life policy, annual dividend,'” issued by the defendant tp William Fiquett, on the 18th of September, 1916, in consideration of a premium of $57.90 paid on the date of the issuance of the policy, and an agreement to pay a like sum on each anniversary of the policy.

The evidence is without dispute that the annual premiums were paid on the policy up to and including the premium due September 18, 1926, but the insured failed to pay the premium due September 18, 1927. On the date of the default in payment of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the U.S. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Bach v. Western States Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Protective Life Ins. Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Alabama Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Meridian Life Ins. Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Land Title Co. of Alabama v. State Ex Rel. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Sarah Ethel WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  4. G. F. A. Peanut Ass'n v. W. F. Covington Planter Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. KernachanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API