Legal Opinion
Aero-Mayflower Transit Company v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 21, 1962No. Civ. 62-216PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action to review and annul two orders of the Interstai^ Commerce Commission entered on May 12 and December 26, 1961, in its Docket No. MC-11,9049, granting T.E.K. Van Lines, Inc.’s application of July 10, 1959, under § 207 of the Interstate Commerce Act [49 U.S.C.A. § 307], to operate as a common carrier by motor vehicle over irregular routes in the transportation of “household goods” between points in Arizona, California, Idaho, Oregon, Utah and Washington, and between points in those States and points in Colorado, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, New Mexico, Texas and Wyoming…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Household Goods Carriers Ass'n v. OuelletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- New England Household Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Neptune World Wide Moving, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Cartwright Van Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973