Legal Opinion

Christman v. Segal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1940No. Appeals, 227 and 228PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The wife plaintiff, a customer in defendant’s department store, was injured in falling into an unguarded stairway to the basement, while following one of defendant’s clerks who was directing her to a toilet. The verdicts in favor of both plaintiffs were set aside and judgments entered for defendant n. o. v. We believe the circumstances impose liability upon the defendant.

This plaintiff was lawfully on the premises as an invitee. As such, the defendant owed her the duty to use due care for her protection and to keep the premises in a reasonably safe condition for the uses…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Bloomer v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Nettis v. General Tire Co. of Philadelphia, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Parsons Et Vir v. DrakeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Clark v. Glosser Bros. Department Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API