Legal Opinion

United States v. Mitchell

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 22, 2005No. 1:03-cv-00194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Defendant Fred Mitchell pled guilty to participation in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine, contrary to 21 U.S.C. § 846. Because the offense carried a maximum penalty of ten years or more, he was subject to detention pending sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). However, defendant argued that there were “exceptional reasons” justifying continuation of his bond. I agreed and therefore allowed him to remain on release. In this memorandum I set forth my reasons.

I. STANDARD FOR RELEASE PENDING SENTENCING

The general rule concerning release pending sentencing is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Efren Herrera-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. KaquatoshDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SharpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. United States v. BraunDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  4. United States v. PosadaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  5. United States v. TobaccoDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API