Legal Opinion

Tillinghast v. Merrill

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court! Action by George S. Tillinghast, as county treasurer of the county of Madison, against J. Herman Merrill, supervisor of the town of Stockbridge, George Porter, and W. Fayette Bridge on a bond. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtHardin, P. J.

Under chapter 555 of the Laws of 1864 it is made the duty of the school commissioners in each county to apportion the public money, and prepare a certificate thereof to be delivered to the supervisor, and to deposit a copy in the office of the respective town clerks; and section 30 of the act provides that the moneys so apportioned to the towns shall be paid to the respective supervisors immediately upon their compliance with the requirements of section 31 of the act. Section 31 provides as follows:

“Immediately on receiving the commissioners’ certificate of apportionment, the county treasurer…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Boyden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Muzzy v. ShattuckCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. Halbert v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. People Ex Rel. Nash v. . FaulknerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. HedgesWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Village of Oneida v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API