Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Jarzabek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 11, 2001, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had no covered base period employment.
Claimant, a limousine driver, was a franchisee of Carey Limousine, New York, Inc. until the relationship was terminated based upon claimant’s breach of the franchise agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, claimant was required to own or lease his own vehicle, he was responsible for its repair, maintenance and insurance, and he was required to purchase a two-way…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Claim of RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Claim of PavanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Claim of RukhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by8 opinions
- Abouzeid v. GrgasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Holcomb v. TWR Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Saleem v. Corporate Transportation Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.