Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Broodno

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

222 Pa. Superior Ct. 478 (1972)

Holmes

v.

Broodno, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted June 14, 1972.

September 15, 1972.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, CERCONE, and PACKEL, JJ.

Thomas Holmes Goldsmith, for appellant.

Arthur J. Seidner, and Jerome Taylor and Associates, for appellee.

OPINION BY PACKEL, J., September 15, 1972:

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, 294 A. 2d 898 (1972).

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Holmes v. BroodnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meta v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. James F. Oakley, Inc. v. Sch. Dist. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Black & Brown, Inc. v. Home for the Accepted, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Mikita v. Bailey Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Friedgen v. Evangelical ManorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API