Legal Opinion
South Carolina v. North Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 2010No. 138, OrigPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito
The State of South Carolina brought this original action against the State of North Carolina, seeking an equitable apportionment of the Catawba River. We appointed a Special Master and referred the matter to her, together with the motions of three nonstate entities seeking to intervene in the dispute as parties. South Carolina opposed the motions. After holding a hearing, the Special Master granted the motions and, upon South Carolina’s request, memorialized the reasons for her decision in a First Interim Report. South Carolina then presented exceptions, and we set the matter for argument.
Two…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- Florida v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District v. HeinemanDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.