Legal Opinion
Frenchman Cambridge Irrigation District v. Heineman
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided September 24, 2013No. 8:12CV445PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on motions to dismiss filed by defendants NCORPE and Upper Republican Natural Resources District (hereinafter, “the DNR Defendants”),1 Filing No. 40; defendants Brian Dunnigan and Dave Heineman (hereinafter, “the State Defendants”),2 Filing No. 42; and defendants Michael Con-nor, Michael Ryan, Kenneth Salazar, the United States Department of Interior, and the United States of America (hereinafter, “the Federal Defendants”),3 Filing No. 45.
This is an action for injunctive and declaratory relief involving a…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friant Water Authority v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Harmon v. Preferred Family Healthcare, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Kraft v. The Office of the Comptroller of the CurrencyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Walker v. City of Fremont, NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021