Legal Opinion

Hicks v. City of Buffalo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 18, 2004No. Docket No. 03-6199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-appellants Mamie L. Hicks, Rogers Hicks, Annetta Rowe, and Kimalin Jones appeal from the judgment of the District Court (W.D.N.Y., Skretny, J.) granting defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, denying plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment, and denying plaintiffs’ motions to take more discovery and to amend the complaint. The parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history is assumed.

On appeal, we are asked to consider only: (1) whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment on plaintiffs’ first…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. Garay v. LirianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Simpson v. Town of Warwick Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Busch v. HowardDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API