Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Gromatsky

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1974No. 74-1171PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The basic claim advanced by appellant is that the tax collection scheme embodied in certain sections of the Internal Revenue Code [i. e,, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6015, 6511 & 6513] relating to withholding taxes and quarterly declarations of estimated income tax is unconstitutional because of its failure to provide for the payment of interest on all amounts of such withholding and estimated tax payments which are later refunded as over-payments. As adjuncts of this claim, he asserts that the court below erred in refusing to request the convening of a three-judge court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282 & 2284…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Grizzle Ex Rel. GrizzleTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sylvester Marx v. Centran CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Joseph Wayne Floyd v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Casas v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API