Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Akron Rubber MacHinery Corp.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 20, 1979No. 79-C-34-BTPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRETT, District Judge.
The offending mechanism injuring the plaintiff in March 1974 is a large rubber mixing mill giving rise to this alleged manufacturer’s product liability claim. Plaintiff was employed by Crest, Inc. (Crest) when he was injured in this industrial accident. Plaintiff’s hand was crushed when it was caught between the rollers of the rub ber mixing mill he was operating and he sustained burns on his abdomen when he was pulled against the hot rollers of the machine. 1 The place of the accident, diversity of citizenship, and the amount of the plaintiffs claim…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Mike Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corporation and Ozark Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Akin v. Big Three IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.