Legal Opinion

Behrns v. Behrns

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 9, 2010No. AC 30734PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

Before us is the third appeal arising out of a separation agreement of the parties, the plaintiff, *797Linda Mae Behms, and the defendant, Ronald Wayne Behms, which, at their request, had been incorporated into their decree of dissolution. This most recent appeal arises from the judgment of the trial court, finding that the defendant was in wilful contempt of the original court order requiring him to pay alimony and child support to the plaintiff every other week. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) failed to follow the mandate set forth in Behrns v.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Worth v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Hospital Media Network, LLC v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Jepsen v. CamassarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  4. Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Worth v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API