Legal Opinion
Phantomalert v. Apple Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-0786Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PHANTOMALERT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-00786 (TNM) APPLE, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION PhantomALERT accuses Apple, Inc., of various antitrust violations, in defiance of the Sherman Antitrust Act and California’s Cartwright Act. It also argues Apple had breached California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Apple moves to dismiss. Rather than opposing that motion, PhantomALERT seeks leave to file an Amended Complaint. The Court will grant the motion to dismiss as conceded. And it will deny the motion to amend as futile.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.