Legal Opinion

Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1951No. 12216_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Beecher appeals from an order of the district court entered on December 20, 1948, affirming orders of the conciliation commissioner fixing the value of Beecher’s orchard properties for the purpose of determining the amount to be paid into court to effect a redemption under Section 75, sub. s(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1 and denying Beecher’s request for a continuance of the hearing at which the value was determined.

The hearing to determine value was .held by the commissioner pursuant to the order of the district court terminating the stay of proceedings, which order…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Wright v. Union Central Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  3. Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. Wolfheim v. South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. Chaney v. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. S. P. Beecher v. Homer Smithson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API